[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: OT: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption

Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 00:31, Ralf Corsepius wrote:

In any case, no corporation is going to use anything which is GPL or
LGPL and risk being taken to court.

They do use it, they just can't distribute it - not even if they
want to give it away.  Which means that the rest of us won't
ever have it.

Wrong. You can dynamically link against LGPL'ed libraries and many
closed source packages, comprising $$$ ones, do.

Yes, but RMS would prefer that the LGPL did not exist.

Tiny, but popular example: RealPlayer (RealPlayer10GOLD.rpm)

ldd usr/local/RealPlayer/realplay.bin
       linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0x00869000)
       libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x00e97000)

You'll note there's nothing like, say, libreadline in

But I bet they violate LGPL. They have to supply it in a form
which the customer can modify for his own use.

This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]