[OT] Fun with walking package licenses

[Mike McCarty]

Andy Green wrote:
> Mike McCarty wrote:
> 
> 
>>>I believe that despite what the packages say, the actual libraries used
>>>in libgcc and compat-libstdc++ are LGPL, so this does not show a problem
>>>AFAIK.
>>
>>According to LGPL, they must provide their own stuff in a form suitable
>>for reverse engineering and modification for the customer's own use.
>>AFAICT, the only real distinction between GPL and LGPL is that the
> 
> 
> We did this last month:

If you don't want to discuss it, then why did you bring it up again?

Mike
-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!