Disk defragmenter in Linux

Mike McCarty mike.mccarty at sbcglobal.net
Mon Jan 2 20:36:35 UTC 2006


Ed Hill wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 11:46 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
> 
>>Tim wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 18:27 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>What I *did* claim is that ext3 is subject to fragmentation.
>>>
>>>
>>>The "so what" answer is probably the best answer that you're going to
>>
>>If you actually bothered to read what went before, you'd see
>>that is response is malapropos.
>>
>>[snip]
>>
>>
>>>I don't worry about fragmentation any more than I worry about other
>>>technicalities of how the data is put onto the drive.
>>
>>Arguing against claims I haven't made.
> 
> 
> *sigh*
> 
> Not true, Mike.  Both the original poster and you discussed performance:

Specifically not true. "Discussion" and "worry" are two different
things. I am myself not worried about whatever the effects on
performance might be, since I am not experiencing any problems
with disc performance. I have not made any claims that whatever
performance hits there are are significant to me. Whether they
are significant to others depends on a variety of factors. I also
don't argue that *you* experience problems with disc performance.

> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2005-December/msg03298.html
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2005-December/msg03340.html
> 
> and you asserted: 
> 
>   "Umm, I believe the argument is not that it defrags itself, just
>    that the type of fragmentation it enjoys does not affect 
>    performance. Some sort of fertilizer[*], if you ask me."
> 
> So, please come up with some actual measurements that will back up your
> "fertilizer" story.

If you actually read what I wrote, you will see that my statement is
that claims that there is no effect on performance is fertilizer.
I did not claim that the effects, whatever they are, bother me,
or anyone else. I simply state that they *exist*.

It is entirely possible that, on my machine, the fragmentation
*enhances* performance. Unlikely, but possible.

Mike
-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!




More information about the fedora-list mailing list