'GPL encumbrance problems'

[Mike McCarty]

David G. Miller (aka DaveAtFraud) wrote:

> It really does come down to a socialism vs. capitalism argument in the 
> end.  The pro [L]GPL crowd points to a claimed beneficial leveling 

I said this a little differently in another e-mail...

[L]GPL is not really about software, it is about a social agenda.
Richard Stallman is some sort of socialist or communist, but without
much of a political agenda. His is more a social agenda.

[snip stuff I pretty much agree with]

Mike
-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!