Fedora Core 3 Transferred to Fedora Legacy

[Rahul Sundaram]

Jeff Spaleta wrote:

>On 1/22/06, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at redhat.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>Nobody stopped anyone from doing the work involved. In fact it was
>>already done before. http://fedora.isphuset.no/
>>    
>>
>
>
>I think the underlying frustration involving the re-spins is one of
>access and branding.  You want it to be accessible for people having
>problems with the regular installer, but you don't want everyone
>assuming its an 'official' iso built by the normal release process.
>
>There is a lot more discussion that needs to happen to see how
>respins, which the core maintainers aren't responsible for, should be
>branded and should be talked about in easily accessible documentation.
>Discussion I was hoping the Foundation could take up at some point. 
>Can a respin project get their own bugzilla component in the same
>bugzilla?
>  
>
We need to discuss  that if only the people who do the work would be 
responsive to requests repeatedly.

>I keep forgetting to ping the http://fedora.isphuset.no/  guys to make
>sure they have written greg concerning trademark permission for the
>respins.  It's an important usage case, which the trademark policy
>should try to explicitly address.
>
>-jef
>  
>
I wrote to them on several occasions with no response whatsoever. Its 
really disappointing.


-- 
Rahul 

Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers