FC2 or Centos 4?

[David Cary Hart]

On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 13:24:32 +0000 (UTC), Kevin Kofler
<kevin.kofler at chello.at> opined:
> David Cary Hart <Fedora <at> TQMcube.com> writes:
> > I am changing to a virtual dedicated web host. My choices are FC2
> > or Centos 4. Anyone have any strong opinions either way?
> 
> I'd go with Centos 4. Fedora only really works well if you're
> staying up to date, if they're offering you FC2 _now_, they
> definitely aren't. And Centos 4 is actually more up to date than
> FC2 (it's about FC3-level in package versions).
> 
>         Kevin Kofler
> 
Thanks. That makes sense. What they are saying is "The holdup has
been lack of NPTL support in UML kernels preventing FC4 from running." 

I thought that issue was resolved in newer UML kernels. Indeed the
current release is for FC5.
-- 
Do NOT Send Email to <spam trap> Fedora at TQMcube,com
Our DNSRBL - Eliminate Spam: http://www.TQMcube.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060609/29ac2f8c/attachment-0001.sig>