Who should own html files?

[Tim]

On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 11:11 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> They should be owned by whoever will be editing them, as Arthur said. If 
> nobody's going to be editing them, having them owned by root is fine.

I'd agree with that for displayable files (HTML, images, etc.).  I'm not
sure about executables (CGI, etc.).  There's risks with them as the root
user, and the Apache user.  Is there a good/better way to employ them?

-- 
(Currently running FC4, occasionally trying FC5.)

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.