Yum better than RPM?

[Rudolf Kastl]

2006/3/2, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com>:
> On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 10:47, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> > 2006/3/2, Ralph.Grothe at itdz-berlin.de <Ralph.Grothe at itdz-berlin.de>:
> > > > Can you tell the rest of us what we are missing by running
> > > > a 32-bit browser or is the difference just indescribable?
> > > >
>
> > you are pulling in 32 bit libs which eat up ram...
>
> Oh, so the reason you like 64-bit is that the libs use
> less ram? That's the first I've heard that...
>

if i load a 64 bit library... and have to load the 32 bit one aswell
cause i need the backwards stuff i waste ram for the 32 bit lib ;).

> > and then again why are you using 64 bit fedora at all if you dont like
> > the 64 bit fuss? ;)
>
> Because it still runs all the old stuff unchanged.
>
> > backwards compat is nice but personally i prefer fixes instead of
> > workarounds, just a matter of attitude.
> >
> > just curious...
>
> You are asking many people to do a lot of work to
> build/test/maintain/distribute additional versions.  I'd
> just like to know what to expect to see in return for
> that extra work.

actually a real solution wouldnt need much more than a rebuild ;).

>
> --
>   Les Mikesell
>    lesmikesell at gmail.com
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>