OT: Novell Is Not SCO

[Mike McCarthy, W1NR]

The groklaw article is the very same day after knee jerk reaction that is 
pointed out in the linux-watch article.  I was ready to dump any relation 
and use of SuSE the day I heard it.  After some more reading and calm 
thought, it now appears to me a very different situation than first thought. 
The jury is still out though...

Mike

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Craig White" <craigwhite at azapple.com>
To: "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: OT: Novell Is Not SCO


> On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 10:59 -0500, taharka wrote:
>> How do,
>>
>> Novell is not SCO
>>
>> Publication:LinuxWatch
>> Date:Nov 09 2006
>> Reporter:Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
>>
>> Novell is not SCO. Novell is not the great anti-GPL. Get over it. I'm
>> getting a little tired of the constant Novell-bashing. Do I think that
>> Novell made a smart long term move by partnering up with Microsoft? No,
>> I don't.
>>
>> Full article at;
>> http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS4287912423.html
>>
>> Note, there is an area for feedback/comments at the above link ;-)
> ----
> for a completely different perspective...
>
> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20061102175508403
>
> Craig
>
> -- 
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>