ATRPMS dependencies conflict

[Chris Jones]

> But allow me to post a warning: Once a package you use from ATrpms
> requires another (sub)package as found in ATrpms, but is shadowed by
> livna, or a package in freshrpms requires another (sub)package from
> freshrpms which is now shadowed by ATrpms and livna, or a package from
> dries <and so on>, then you get peculiar bugs that are specific to how
> you setup your system and the priorities, e.g. it is not even
> reproducable by other users that use the same repos.
>
> The repo maintainers may have tried to provide sane packages
> compatible with the other repos, but the priorities revert this work.
>
> This is called selective/partial enabling of a repo and no repo will
> support any issues that may yield out of this. Because, as said, the
> resulting bugs are of a rather per host nature.

Thanks for the warning. taken on board.

I *think* the only problem I had was with ffmpeg. There seems to be a 
definitive difference in how this is packaged between livna and atrpms that 
leads to conflicts. If this could be fixed I would be happy to try again 
without priorities.

cheers Chris