On Tuesday July 31 2007, Timothy Murphy wrote: > > Definitely an asset when connected to a SAN. > > Why, as a matter of interest? I'm sorry, I thought you wanted cases presented in favour of LVM. It has it's place where it's use is appropriate and I use it on my machines that are connected to my SAN. It is sometimes easier to use some of the LVM utilities to manage LUNs presented to a linux box than the SAN especially when resizing a LUN.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.