[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Changing resolution on laptop

On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 10:36 -0500, Claude Jones wrote:
> I had always followed the above adage, but of late, I've seen signs and 
> have had evidence that it no longer holds, and I've wondered about that. In 
> the early days of lcd's trying to use anything but native resolution always 
> looked horrible. I've seen more recent offerings where that didn't hold - so, 
> I wonder if you know what accounts for that. Is there some fancy 
> anti-aliasing going in the video cards, have the lcd chip technologies 
> changed, or what? For example, my HP ZX5000 laptop with native 1920X1200 
> screen reso, looks just fine if I down-rez it - there's a very slight 
> increase in aliasing, and a very slight blurring, but, nothing like I've seen 
> on early vintage lcd's.

It could be as simple as this:  Newer LCD screens have higher
resolutions than the older ones, and the aliasing errors on in-between
screen modes, as well as non-synchronised pixels and LCD elements, are
now just smaller.

An 800x600 screen really only works at that rate.  Trying 640x480 on it
is going to look awful because it's not directly half (two graphic
pixels will not cover exactly one LCD element).

Take that up to around twice that resolution, and you've got much
smaller screen pixels to work with.  Errors are much smaller.  And
you've got more options (the native resolution, and direct divisions
like half resolution), ones in-between will still have *some* aliasing

If OSs would only get better at letting you pick sizes of fonts and GUI
elements, we'd be in a better boat.  Some people don't want to run their
monitors at full resolution as the display gets too tiny, and what they
have to counteract that doesn't do a very good job.

(This PC runs FC4, my others FC5 & FC6, in case that's important
 to the thread)

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]