Beagle
Rahul Sundaram
sundaram at fedoraproject.org
Sat Jan 20 05:32:08 UTC 2007
Ric Moore wrote:
> Not for me. :)
Might be too constructive I guess ;-)
As I said, they are not the same application at all. So
> how could mikmod obsolete tracker? They are two different animals
> although they are cousins.
It doesnt have to provide 1:1 functionality for one package to obsolete
another. It almost never does. Any RPM package can obsolete any others
in fact. Like I said this was done long back. If you want the old
tracker back, you know what to do.
> Yours makes no sense to me either, but that seems to be the way of it.
What exactly doesnt make sense? Calling a new package "pine" is a non
starter. If you want to seriously suggest a rename, get on the tracker
list and do that.
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
>
> "It consists of a common object database that allows entities to have an
> almost infinite number of properties, metadata (both embedded/harvested
> as well as user definable), a comprehensive database of keywords/tags
> and links to other entities.
>
> It is not a database?
It is not *just a database*. It uses a database.
http://www.gnome.org/projects/tracker/
Rahul
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list