Laptop recomendations
Thompson Freeman
tfreeman at intel.digichem.net
Thu Mar 15 21:46:35 UTC 2007
On 03/15/2007 05:03:47 PM, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Thursday 15 March 2007, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > Dotan Cohen wrote:
> > > All American measurements are of these unusual division. The inch
> > > itself is 1/12 foot, which is 1/5280 of a mile. Maybe not
> arbitrary,
> > > but not very intuitive.
> >
> > Not to defend the US units, but hasn't the meter been redefined at
> least
> > 3 times? Which of the choices was a unit that relates to something
> > intuitive to a human?
> >
None of the redefinitions of the meter relates to something intuitive
to a human that I know of. The redefinitions were made to it easier to
transmit/transfer/standardize the unit the world over. The length of a
given number of cycles of a particular atomic transition's radiation is
remarkably consistant, best anybody can tell. Not so for a
irridium/<?something?> bar held in a vault somewhere. Same process
happens with the second and hopefully soon (within the decade??) the
kilogram. The second is defined by the time to make a certain number of
cycles from some element's hyperfine splitting, not by a fraction of
the rotation of the earth which wants to change by measurable amounts.
We would like to get rid of the standard kilogram and replace it with a
counted number of isotopically pure atoms, or a force, but that effort
is still underway.
<<snip>>
> My daughter and I make the men in the family wince because we tend to
> take
> measurements like 'four inches and two millimetres' :-) We're *very*
>
> accurate ;-)
Probably correct common usage, but that makes me itch. Precise maybe,
but "accurate" doesn't seem right to me. Mixing units like that would
make me wince also.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list