kernel upgrade with yum removed old kernels

Kam Leo kam.leo at gmail.com
Mon May 7 20:26:17 UTC 2007


On 5/7/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Kam Leo wrote:
>
> > True. However, the track record for my submitted RFEs leads me to that
> > conclusion. Getting "Not a bug" or "Won't fix" as the only feedback
> > would discourage most people from such foolish pursuits.
>
> Enhancements are decided on a case by case basis. Sweeping
> generalizations are almost always mistaken.

For me the submission of an RFE is a roll of the dice. In a few
instances, very few, the developer takes the time to discuss why the
RFE is rejected. The typical

> > Yes, it does. If some one want to contribute code to the Linux kernel
> > they have to follow a coding standard. A standard (one probably exits)
> > can be applied to code developed within Fedora Core. Lack of or weak
> > enforcement is the biggest headache.
>
> Code developed within Fedora is very trivial compared to the amount of
> software in the distribution.

In quantity, yes. Quality???

>The large majority of code in inherited
> from upstream projects and flows back into it. A standard for code or
> enforcement of such within Fedora makes a negligible difference to the
> end user experience unlike the kernel. Your assumption on that is
> incorrect.

Not so. A piece of code developed within Fedora Core impacted the end
user experience. If there had not been any impact we wouldn't be
having this discussion.

> Rahul




More information about the fedora-list mailing list