[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: 2.6.23 kernel (Troll alrert)



On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 19:57 +1000, Res wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Res wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Scott Henson wrote:
> >>
> >>> John Wendel wrote:
> >>> <snip>
> >>>>
> >>>> Don't be a wimp!  Seriously, if you've got some spare time and a
> >>>> non-critical box, you should build 2.6.23, beat it up, and file
> >>>> bug reports. It's the way we non-kernel-developers can
> >>>> contribute.
> >>>
> >>> I have no problem with that, but as for a box I actually care
> >>> about and want to get stuff done on, vendor kernels all the way.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I recall, hrmmmmmm RH4 i think it was, maybe earlier, an automatic
> >> update rendored my desktop useless, they corrected it within hours,
> >> but thats too late for the poor suckers like me that were affected,
> >> since then, a valuable lesson learnt was never trust a vendors
> >> "update" verbatim, and since then, I've never used a RH kernel, once
> >> bitten ok, twice bitten your a damned fool.
> >
> > ummmmmm ... over-dramatize much?
> >
> 
> > rday
> 
> ummmm when your responsible for what I am, yeah, because I'm paid to not 
> have things fuck up, but since we moved all servers to Slackware, we've 
> never had a single hiccup, so I aint had to any problems in years.
> for fucks sake, RH cant even sort out their own rsync servers, why would I 
> try trusting them again, its a complete joke, and the funny thing is, the 
> same person resposible for it is probably still in that job
> 

... Might I inquire why do you continue to soil this ML with your
offensive language and anti-RH/Fedora posts?

- Gilboa
/* don't bother answering; I've already added your email address to my
junk filter */


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]