Whence cdecl?

[Alan M. Evans]

On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 07:49 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> cdecl was removed because the copyright status was uncertain.  The 
> original release was an ancient posting on Usenet which didn't contain 
> any copyright or license information in the way that we currently 
> understand them.

Thanks for the info. I guess that I'm just part of that dying breed of C
developer. Every once in awhile I see something particularly obtuse and
think, "What, exactly, *is* that a pointer to?"

I suppose if I really want it then I'll have to go grab the source RPM
off some old RedHat install disks that I just *knew* I was keeping
around for some reason or another.