Fedora Desktop future- RedHat moves

[Antonio Olivares]

--- Arthur Pemberton <pemboa at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Antonio Olivares
> <olivares14031 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >  On adobe flash, you bring up an interesting
> point, ads
> >  are everywhere, if adobe flash is not present,
> you
> >  cannot do anything.
> 
> You need to start visiting better sites. No good
> website relies on
> flash that heavily.

Yes, but I have to visit "those sites" otherwise, I
cannot read many messages and posts.  I have tried
adblockers, but they make the page load more slowly
and at home, it makes it really a pain in the as*
> 
> 
> >  If some software is illegal, what will the big
> guys do
> >  to a little guy?  Will they sue me because I have
> >  nonfree stuff?  What will they do to me?  I can
> see
> >  the logic for the big corporations and companies,
> but
> >  for the little guys, the home users, it does not
> make
> >  much sense.
> 
> Who says it has to make sense? Big business sue
> little guys all the time.
You are right :) RIAA rings a bell.  Question is why?
do they go after someone who has next to nothing,
instead of others who have more? 
> 
> -- 
> Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
> ( www.pembo13.com )
> 
> -- 
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe:
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> 



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ