Fedora Desktop future- RedHat moves
max bianco
maximilianbianco at gmail.com
Sat Apr 26 16:12:53 UTC 2008
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Antonio Olivares
<olivares14031 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> --- Arthur Pemberton <pemboa at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Antonio Olivares
> > <olivares14031 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > On adobe flash, you bring up an interesting
> > point, ads
> > > are everywhere, if adobe flash is not present,
> > you
> > > cannot do anything.
> >
> > You need to start visiting better sites. No good
> > website relies on
> > flash that heavily.
>
> Yes, but I have to visit "those sites" otherwise, I
> cannot read many messages and posts. I have tried
> adblockers, but they make the page load more slowly
> and at home, it makes it really a pain in the as*
>
> >
> >
> > > If some software is illegal, what will the big
> > guys do
> > > to a little guy? Will they sue me because I have
> > > nonfree stuff? What will they do to me? I can
> > see
> > > the logic for the big corporations and companies,
> > but
> > > for the little guys, the home users, it does not
> > make
> > > much sense.
> >
> > Who says it has to make sense? Big business sue
> > little guys all the time.
> You are right :) RIAA rings a bell. Question is why?
> do they go after someone who has next to nothing,
> instead of others who have more?
>
Because others who have more, have the resources to tie them up in
court for years.
Max
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list