Infrastructure status, 2008-08-19 UTC 0200

[Tim]

Tim:
>> Is it just me, or do others also think that a public email (even a
>> signed one) would be almost the worst place to trust a fingerprint
>> announcement?

Laszlo BERES:
> If the mail is correctly signed then it's OK.

A message being correctly signed isn't quite the same thing as being
able to verify that it's been produced by the person in question.

-- 
[tim at localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.25.14-108.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.