[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: FC11: Two Suggestions



On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:58 PM,  <homburg tips-q com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 17:46:32 -0300
> "Armin Moradi" <feng shaun gmail com> wrote:
>
>> > Again, I am not knocking KDE4. However, it is a radical
>> > departure from something that I have been using since
>> > RH-9, possibly earlier.
>>
>> Ummm...to me, KDE 4.1 seems quite stable at this point,
>> and has most of the features an average user would need.
>> That's just what I think though.
>>
> The stability is not the issue. I don't want to get into
> comparisons and create a stunningly tedious thread (like
> the old KDE v. Gnome "discussions.") The issue is simpler;
> KDE4 represents a totally different UI that presents a
> migration challenge to "more experienced" users.


That means either of a few things:
1. this is an over generalization
2. this is simply not true
3. I am rare case
4. I am not within the "more experienced" users category

-- 
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]