[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: FC11: Two Suggestions

On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 15:14:59 -0600
"Arthur Pemberton" <pemboa gmail com> wrote:

> How is Sugar related to KDE though?

It's not. However, I SUSPECT that there might be more
people who want KDE-3.5 than Sugar. It's worth exploring.
It could be just me but I don't think so due to discussions
that I have seen on other forums. My impression is that
there is a fairly sizable group of 3.5x users who won't
change to 4. 
> > Again, I am not knocking KDE4. However, it is a radical
> > departure from something that I have been using since
> > RH-9, possibly earlier.
> KDE 3.5 was fairly different than what was in RH-9 if I
> remember correctly.

Not really IIRC. Moreover, this is the first KDE release
since then without an upgrade path. New releases have added
features and horsepower but have been consistent in
> This is an attempt to protect the innocent and
> uninformed. The very people who shouldn't be logging in
> as root. Those who have enough information to make the
> decision for themselves generally can make the switch
> themselves as well.
That makes sense until you have a bunch of problems with a
new installation and need to figure out how to make the
edit to log into a UI as boot. It's not up to Fedora to
protect me from my own stupidity - that would be a losing
proposition from the outset ;-)

"Neither Lifestyle nor Agenda"

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]