[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Current state of multi-core awareness

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:11 PM,  <dsavage peaknet net> wrote:
> Building up F10 on my new quad-core uber-laptop is becoming a painful
> exercise in single-threadedness, at least as far as Package Manager is
> concerned. PM may be graphical and intuitive, but it's obviously not
> designed to use more than one core. When it's checking dependencies or
> installing packages, one core is solidly pegged at 100% while the other
> three cores are idling.
> Of the thousands of 64-bit F10 applications/tools/utilities, I wonder how
> many are aware of and can scale across multiple cores. Has anyone done a
> recent survey to see which packages are [not] multi-core aware?
> A similar question was recently raised about the state of IPv6 support in
> Windows and Linux. It turns out their kernels are IPv6 compatible, but
> most applications (notably all MS Office apps) are decidedly not.
> --Doc Savage
>  Fairview Heights, IL
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list redhat com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

It's times like this I miss BeOS...

Anyway, just a me too here. I've noticed several applications only
using one core on my Athlon X2 5200+...


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]