[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Fixed: Rawstudio is broken in F10 ?



On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 10:08:04 -0500, Linuxguy123 wrote:

> On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 17:49 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 09:19:04 -0500, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> > 
> > > $ rawstudio
> > > rawstudio: error while loading shared libraries: libexiv2.so.0: cannot
> > > open shared object file: No such file or directory
> > > 
> > > $ yum list exiv*
> > > Loaded plugins: downloadonly, kmdl, priorities, refresh-packagekit
> > > 0 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
> > > Installed Packages
> > > exiv2.i386
> > > 0.17.1-1.fc10
> > > installed
> > > exiv2-devel.i386
> > > 0.17.1-1.fc10
> > > installed
> > > exiv2-libs.i386
> > > 0.17.1-1.fc10
> > > installed
> > 
> > And where do you demonstrate that one of these packages actually
> > provides libexiv2.so.0?
> 
> Sorry.
> 
> $ rpm -ql exiv2-devel | grep lib
> /usr/lib/libexiv2.so
> /usr/lib/pkgconfig/exiv2.pc
> 
> I renamed it to libexiv2.so.0 and rawstudio runs. 
> 
> 
> > It isn't provided in these packages. It's ancient. Most recent you can get
> > is libexiv2.so.1 (F9) and libexiv2.so.4 (F10).
> 
> Apparently its not ancient, its still being shipped. 

No, it isn't. Please don't spread misinformation. Other users find
such things via search engines and then are misguided.

libexiv2.so -- if renamed to libexiv2.so.0 -- is not equivalent to
libexiv2.so.0. It's still only a symlink to libexiv2.so.4, which is not
guaranteed to be compatible in its interface. Consider yourself lucky that
some parts seem to be compatible enough to serve as a work-around.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]