On Friday 12 December 2008 21:08:14 Jeff Spaleta wrote: > But the > unanswered question is, other than deliberately refusing to allow > security updates to be rushed how do we reduce the risk of that > mistake from happening again? How often has this happened? In the real scheme of things, what percentage of packages have caused problems like this? I'm not denying the problems that some people have had, but is there, perhaps, some over-reaction? To increase risk by denying security fixes for some time, I'd need to be persuaded that there actually is a serious problem. And I'm not entirely convinced. Anne
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.