infrastructure modest proposal

[Anne Wilson]

On Friday 12 December 2008 21:08:14 Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> But the
> unanswered question is, other than deliberately refusing to allow
> security updates to be rushed how do we reduce the risk of that
> mistake from happening again?

How often has this happened?  In the real scheme of things, what percentage of 
packages have caused problems like this?  I'm not denying the problems that 
some people have had, but is there, perhaps, some over-reaction?

To increase risk by denying security fixes for some time, I'd need to be 
persuaded that there actually is a serious problem.  And I'm not entirely 
convinced.

Anne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20081212/58cd2fee/attachment-0001.sig>