[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS - FIX

Gerhard Magnus wrote:
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 19:39 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen tmr com>
To: fedora-list redhat com
Date: 12/12/2008 01:20 PM

I try not to be a whiner, but this is about the forth time in a few months that someone has released a package without ever testing it on a system with SElinux enabled. Some of those may be multiple reports, but at least three required policy changes.

You'll be happy to know that I've joined QA and I run systems with SELinux off and enforcing. There's at least one tester now that runs with SELinux. ;)

Yes, I use NFS (between SCO Unix, too) and use the machines daily. Hopefully I'll stop a lot of these bugs from hitting stable.

Thank you! And if it will be useful I can offer to install thing from updates-testing on an FC10 VM, which seem to find many if not all issues.


I installed selinix-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm (and targeted) and rpcbind started without issues.

As a workaround, I've (temporarily) put selinux in permissive mode but
installing selinux-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm seems safer. Wheres
did you find it? (Google is no help.) What do you mean by "and

yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey upgrade selinux-*

That will install
and possibly, if you have it installed,

Now your system works again for NFS.

Bill Davidsen <davidsen tmr com>
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]