[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: F10, VMware Server 2.0, and selinux



On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Ed Greshko <Ed Greshko greshko com> wrote:
>>
>> Right? They have a right to do what-ever they want. I never argued
>> otherwise.
>>
> Then you should not be getting "annoyed".   Maybe disappointed...but
> certainly not annoyed.
>> Question is - should Fedora go along with their decision, and support
>> their semi-broken RPMs, half-working SELinux support, missing upstream
>> kernel support and their decision to keep certain features Windows-only.
>> FWIW my vote is a (big) no - Fedora's resources will be better spent on
>> qemu-kvm and virt-*.
>>
>>
> What do you mean "should Fedora go along with their decision"?   Fedora
> isn't supporting anything with regards to VMware and VMware isn't giving
> any consideration to Fedora.  I think you have created a relationship
> where none exists.

Sight.
The OP talked about reporting SELinux issues w/ VMWare to bugzilla.redhat.com.
This constitute spending Fedora resources (read: Fedora's SELinux
maintainer's time) on supporting VMWare's decision.

- Gilboa


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]