[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?



On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Arthur Pemberton <pemboa gmail com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Timothy Murphy <gayleard eircom net> wrote:
>> MKas wrote:
>>
>>> I like KDE, but what I see:
>>>
>>> bash-3.2# yum remove *gnome*
>>
>> Surely you don't have to remove *gnome* in order to use KDE?
>
>
> True. But it makes the arguement that KDE in Fedora is vibrant more
> difficult when you can't have KDE without Gnome.
>
>  bluez                   i386    4.19-1.fc10                   installed  979 k
>  firefox                 i386    3.0.5-1.fc10                  installed   14 M
>  firstboot               i386    1.102-1.fc10                  installed  652 k
>  kdeutils                i386    6:4.1.3-1.fc10                installed  5.6 M
>  setroubleshoot          noarch  2.0.12-3.fc10                 installed  275 k
>  system-config-date      noarch  1.9.34-1.fc10                 installed  3.8 M
>  system-config-keyboard  noarch  1.2.15-4.fc10                 installed  189 k
>  system-config-network   noarch  1.5.93-2.fc10                 installed  1.8 M
>  system-config-printer   i386    1.0.12-2.fc10                 installed  1.6 M
>  system-config-samba     noarch  1.2.67-3.fc10                 installed  2.1 M
>  system-config-services  noarch  0.99.28-3.fc10                installed  1.5 M
>  xulrunner               i386    1.9.0.5-1.fc10                installed   22 M
>
> None of the above should need gnome libs to work. gtk libs, sure.. but
> not Gnome.
>

Yes, I have a lot of *gnome* package in my customized XFCE *only*
desktop spin :-)
That's the life, I have to live with :-)

-- 
http://vnoss.org


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]