mysql JDBC tomcat

Robert L Cochran cochranb at speakeasy.net
Fri Feb 15 14:56:04 UTC 2008


The Fedora 8 implementation of tomcat5 and jetty has a major bug: both
tomcat5 and jetty, as packaged by the providers, use the same port by
default. Usually jetty is started up before tomcat5, and this guarantees
that tomcat5, by default, will break because jetty is listening on that
same port. To fix the problem, you need to edit /etc/tomcat5/server.xml
and change the default connector port number.

Why does Fedora 8 include jetty? Because Fedora Eclipse needs it.

The default implementations of tomcat5 and jetty need to change to so
that they use different port numbers of both these packages are being
installed.

I don't know if this has any bearing on your problem -- on the surface
of it, doesn't seem so -- but I wanted to mention this.

Bob Cochran
Greenbelt, Maryland, USA

tony.chamberlain at lemko.com wrote:
>  
> Perhaps there is a mysql group I could ask?  But I will ask here anyway.
>
> Someone is using java and tomcat and mysql.  Accessing mysql on 10.0.0.66
> from 10.10.0.2.  They are pingable from each other but go through gateway
> 10.10.0.30.
>
> And mysql -h 10.0.0.66 
> from 10.10.0.2 returns a prompt after a while.
>
> However using jdbc times out even with a timeout of 70000.  Here is
> the command:
>
>
> jdbc:mysql://10.0.0.66/dma_oam?useUnicode=true&characterEncoding=Big5&socketTimeout=700000&connectTimeout=700000  
> id
> (id omitted from this message for security reasons)
>
> This is being executed from Java.
>
> And to repeat, when it was used before there were 1 hop from server
> machine to host machine (like here):
>
>     traceroute to 10.0.0.50 (10.0.0.50), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
>      1  10.0.0.50 (10.0.0.50)  1.158 ms  0.198 ms  0.186 ms
>
> but in this case there are two
>
>     traceroute to 10.0.0.66 (10.0.0.66), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
>      1  10.10.0.30 (10.10.0.30)  20.068 ms  19.775 ms  19.806 ms
>      2  10.0.0.66 (10.0.0.66)  24.404 ms  23.240 ms  23.249 ms
>
>
>
> Could this be the reason for the timeout?  Can jdbc not hop?
>
>
> if you are interested, here is a stack backtrace
>
> java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
>         at java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead0(Native Method)
>         at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:129)
>         at java.io.BufferedInputStream.fill(BufferedInputStream.java:218)
>         at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read1(BufferedInputStream.java:258)
>         at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:317)
>         at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.readFully(MysqlIO.java:1316)
>         at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.reuseAndReadPacket(MysqlIO.java:1463)
>         at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.checkErrorPacket(MysqlIO.java:1854)
>         at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.sendCommand(MysqlIO.java:1109)
>         at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.sqlQueryDirect(MysqlIO.java:1203)
>         at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.sqlQuery(MysqlIO.java:1164)
>         at com.mysql.jdbc.Connection.execSQL(Connection.java:2087)
>         at com.mysql.jdbc.Connection.execSQL(Connection.java:2037)
>         at com.mysql.jdbc.Statement.executeQuery(Statement.java:1156)
>         at
> com.mysql.jdbc.Connection.initializePropsFromServer(Connection.java:2753)
>         at com.mysql.jdbc.Connection.createNewIO(Connection.java:1671)
>         at com.mysql.jdbc.Connection.<init>(Connection.java:432)
>
>




More information about the fedora-list mailing list