Any hope of KDE 3.5 in F10? I want it too !

[David Boles]

Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> 
>> They'll wait till Fedora users and other similar early adopters have
>> helped iron out the bugs. Kinda like Pulse Audio, NetworkManager, etc
> 
> I fear that will be a very long wait ...
> 
> Actually, NM has been getting slowly but steadily better on my machines.
> It would have been very foolish to have waited.
> (But I still don't like NM's "works like magic" approach.)
> 
> Sound remains a complete mystery to me.
> As far as I can make out, pulseaudio is one of several "developments"
> that were intended to make the sound setup simpler,
> but which in fact have added another layer of obfuscation
> to an already confused mess.
> Too many cooks spoil the broth?


Pulseaudio is supposed to allow you to set the volume level(s) of various 
applications/output devices so that they can be different. Music soft. Ta-Ta! 
loud. As well as others. What is not so functional is the applications that 
are not yet able to mix with pulseaudio.

I can;t speak about NM. I don't need or use it. I know some that do use it and 
they do not have problems. I read of problems here though. Which, to me, 
sounds like hardware support problems.
-- 


   David

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20080621/0f077df7/attachment-0001.sig>