PackageUpdater: silently changing license ?!?

Todd Zullinger tmz at pobox.com
Tue Mar 11 12:45:23 UTC 2008


Kenn Thyrsted wrote:
> So...Theoretically i could install a program licensed under GNU GPL
> , and then - if i do not pay attention - end up with the very same
> (updated) program installed under some proprietary license by means
> of the update feature.

Nope.  The license could change, but it must be a free software
license that is acceptable in Fedora.  The list of acceptable licenses
(as well as some explicitly listed unacceptable licenses) is at:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing

So, you might find a package changes its license from GPLv2 to GPLv3+.
Or perhaps from GPLv2 to BSD.  But you won't even find a license move
to some proprietary license.  If you do, please file a bug immediately
so the maintainer of such a package can be suitably tarred and
feathered. ;)

-- 
Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Suppose I were a member of Congress, and suppose I were an idiot. But,
I repeat myself.
    -- Mark Twain

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 542 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20080311/c2a916d2/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the fedora-list mailing list