Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?

Arthur Pemberton pemboa at gmail.com
Wed Mar 26 06:58:56 UTC 2008


On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 8:48 PM, David G. Mackay <mackay_d at bellsouth.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 18:41 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>  > > Fedora seems to be getting away from this, but one of the selling points
>  > > for Slackware used to be that you could take some of the older hardware
>  > > that wouldn't be able to handle the latest Microsoft OS, and still do
>  > > useful things with it under Linux.
>  >
>  > Centos 3.x is still a moderately good choice for this.  In fedora terms
>  > it would be very, very similar to FC1 (2.4 kernel, etc.) but still
>  > getting updates.
>
>  I was thinking of updating my firewall/router box to Centos 4.6.  Do you
>  have any thoughts/warnings on this?
>
>
>
>  Dave

Why not Centos 5?

-- 
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )




More information about the fedora-list mailing list