Fedora Desktop future- RedHat moves

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 08:15 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Da Rock wrote:
> 
> > Actually, based on the preposition here by Redhat then even hosting this
> > list would cause illegalities to be linked to them as every time the
> > question comes up someone posts links and answers...
> 
> User generated content in the lists aren't the same as official website 
> documentation. Refer the following for details.
> 
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.advisory-board/3288

Rahul, thanks for that link, it's very interesting. This message seems
to address my question fairly directly:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.advisory-board/3351,
specifically this:

"You cannot link to livna/RPM Fusion from within a package, RH Legal was
very clear on that. You can link to the Fedoraproject.org page that
links to it, but not directly to it."

This would imply that the restriction is not transitive.

poc