kernel-2.6.24.5-85.fc8: update fails

Steven P. Ulrick lists-fedora at afolkey2.net
Tue May 6 06:13:28 UTC 2008


On Mon, 05 May 2008 19:06:02 -0400
Sam Varshavchik <mrsam at courier-mta.com> wrote:

> Steven P. Ulrick writes:

> >> >   Installing: kernel
> >> > ######################### [1/3] nash received SIGSEGV!  Backtrace
> >> > (11): /sbin/nash[0x805314a]
> >> > [0x110440]
> >> > /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0[0x314ce13]
> >> > /usr/lib/libbdevid.so.6.0.19(bdevid_module_unload_all+0x31)[0x8c3e37]
> >> > /usr/lib/libbdevid.so.6.0.19(bdevid_destroy+0x2d)[0x8c357c]
> >> > /usr/lib/libnash.so.6.0.19[0x967174]
> >> > /usr/lib/libnash.so.6.0.19(nash_vitals_destroy_probes+0x3f)[0x9677ec]
> >> > /usr/lib/libnash.so.6.0.19(_nashFreeContext+0x1c)[0x957fc6]
> >> > /sbin/nash[0x80536e4]
> >> > /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe0)[0xafe390]
> >> > /sbin/nash[0x804ae61]

> >> > /sbin/nash[0x804ae61]
> >> > error: %post(kernel-2.6.24.5-85.fc8.i686) scriptlet failed,
> >> > signal 2
> >> 
> >> Run memtest86, and check for bad RAM.
> > 
> > Hello Sam
> > I ran memtest86 for about 45 minutes and there were no errors.  I'll
> > try running it again this evening for a much longer period of time.
> 
> If memtest comes up clean, you probably have some core system
> libraries corrupted in some way. Try running rpm -V glibc
> glibc-common nash

Hello Sam,
I re-ran Memtest86 for 3 hours and 26 minutes and it reported no
errors.  So I ran "rpm -V glibc glibc-common nash" and the results were
as follows:

[root at afolkey2 ~]# rpm -V glibc glibc-common nash
[root at afolkey2 ~]#

 




More information about the fedora-list mailing list