kernel-2.6.24.5-85.fc8: update fails

Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Tue May 6 13:34:59 UTC 2008


Steven P. Ulrick wrote, at 05/06/2008 03:13 PM +9:00:
> On Mon, 05 May 2008 19:06:02 -0400
> Sam Varshavchik <mrsam at courier-mta.com> wrote:
> 
>> Steven P. Ulrick writes:
> 
>>>>>   Installing: kernel
>>>>> ######################### [1/3] nash received SIGSEGV!  Backtrace
>>>>> (11): /sbin/nash[0x805314a]
>>>>> [0x110440]
>>>>> /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0[0x314ce13]
>>>>> /usr/lib/libbdevid.so.6.0.19(bdevid_module_unload_all+0x31)[0x8c3e37]
>>>>> /usr/lib/libbdevid.so.6.0.19(bdevid_destroy+0x2d)[0x8c357c]
>>>>> /usr/lib/libnash.so.6.0.19[0x967174]
>>>>> /usr/lib/libnash.so.6.0.19(nash_vitals_destroy_probes+0x3f)[0x9677ec]
>>>>> /usr/lib/libnash.so.6.0.19(_nashFreeContext+0x1c)[0x957fc6]
>>>>> /sbin/nash[0x80536e4]
>>>>> /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe0)[0xafe390]
>>>>> /sbin/nash[0x804ae61]
> 
>>>>> /sbin/nash[0x804ae61]
>>>>> error: %post(kernel-2.6.24.5-85.fc8.i686) scriptlet failed,
>>>>> signal 2
>>>> Run memtest86, and check for bad RAM.
>>> Hello Sam
>>> I ran memtest86 for about 45 minutes and there were no errors.  I'll
>>> try running it again this evening for a much longer period of time.
>> If memtest comes up clean, you probably have some core system
>> libraries corrupted in some way. Try running rpm -V glibc
>> glibc-common nash
> 
> Hello Sam,
> I re-ran Memtest86 for 3 hours and 26 minutes and it reported no
> errors.  So I ran "rpm -V glibc glibc-common nash" and the results were
> as follows:
> 
> [root at afolkey2 ~]# rpm -V glibc glibc-common nash
> [root at afolkey2 ~]#

Please see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443332
and check if your problem is reproducible. If so, please file a bug
against nash.

Regards,
Mamoru




More information about the fedora-list mailing list