KDE 4...

[Tim]

On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 03:39 -0400, Chris Snook wrote:
> It's certainly a risky way to handle a major version change, but if
> you do it right, it's a lot more efficient than long, drawn-out
> migrations such as the Apache 1->2 change.  For Apache, the gradual
> approach was necessary given all the production web servers out there

Which, unfortunately, still are stuck on 1, because so many of them
depend on things like CPanel which *STILL* doesn't work with 2 (or so
the hosts say).

-- 
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.