[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Make a DHCP server using Fedora - Help



--- On Sat, 11/15/08, Tim <ignored_mailbox yahoo com au> wrote:

> From: Tim <ignored_mailbox yahoo com au>
> Subject: Re: Make a DHCP server using Fedora - Help
> To: olivares14031 yahoo com, "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list redhat com>
> Date: Saturday, November 15, 2008, 1:57 AM
> On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 17:42 -0800, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> > subnet 10.154.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
> > }
> > 
> > # This is a very basic subnet declaration.
> > 
> > subnet 10.154.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.224 {
> >   range 10.154.19.10 10.154.19.20;
> >   option routers rtr-239-0-1.example.org,
> rtr-239-0-2.example.org;
> > }
> 
> It seems pointlessly redundant to declare a subnet twice. 
> And stranger
> to declare it differently.  I see no point for the first
> one.
> 
> -- 
> [tim localhost ~]$ uname -r
> 2.6.26.6-79.fc9.i686
> 
> Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox
> is ignored.  I
> read messages from the public lists.

Which one should I keep Tim, the first one or the second one?

I have tried  before and not succeeded, I want to succeed this time. 

The machine that will become the server has gateway 10.154.19.1, is it okay to make the server 
10.154.19.0 ?

Also the machine's netmask is 255.255.255.0 and the netmask of the server should it be 255.255.255.0 or 255.255.255.254 or other thing?

Thanks,

Antonio


      


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]