[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Make a DHCP server using Fedora - Help



Antonio Olivares wrote:
--- On Sat, 11/15/08, Tim <ignored_mailbox yahoo com au> wrote:

  
From: Tim <ignored_mailbox yahoo com au>
Subject: Re: Make a DHCP server using Fedora - Help
To: olivares14031 yahoo com, "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list redhat com>
Date: Saturday, November 15, 2008, 1:57 AM
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 17:42 -0800, Antonio Olivares wrote:
    
subnet 10.154.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
}

# This is a very basic subnet declaration.

subnet 10.154.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.224 {
  range 10.154.19.10 10.154.19.20;
  option routers rtr-239-0-1.example.org,
      
rtr-239-0-2.example.org;
    
}
      
It seems pointlessly redundant to declare a subnet twice. 
And stranger
to declare it differently.  I see no point for the first
one.

-- 
[tim localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.26.6-79.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox
is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.
    

Which one should I keep Tim, the first one or the second one?

I have tried  before and not succeeded, I want to succeed this time. 

The machine that will become the server has gateway 10.154.19.1, is it okay to make the server 
10.154.19.0 ?

Also the machine's netmask is 255.255.255.0 and the netmask of the server should it be 255.255.255.0 or 255.255.255.254 or other thing?

Thanks,

Antonio

Dear You,

Please try these :

<>subnet 10.154.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.224
{
range 10.154.19.10 10.154.19.20;
option routers rtr-239-0-1.example.org,rtr-239-0-2.example.org;
}

Good luck !

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]