fedora-list Digest, Vol 56, Issue 25

rajiv R rajbgm at gmail.com
Fri Oct 3 11:23:56 UTC 2008


Hi,

Please help on how to install Fedora on latest motherboards of intel, i am
getting a messages sayin "I/O error", when i slect for manual/automatic
partition.

Thanks and Regards
WebDeveloper
PeopleTree

On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 4:48 PM, <fedora-list-request at redhat.com> wrote:

> Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
>        fedora-list at redhat.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        fedora-list-request at redhat.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        fedora-list-owner at redhat.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin problem - (x86-64)
>      (Matthew Flaschen)
>   2. Re: 64 Bit Linux shows 4GB... was Using all of 4GB RAM...
>      (Matthew Flaschen)
>   3. Installation problem on Dell OptiPlex620 (Tony Molloy)
>   4. F10: Empathy has no support for IRC protocol? (Renich Bon Ciric)
>   5. Re: disable ipv6 (Andrea Bencini)
>   6. f9 encrypted fs - how??? (Wolfgang S. Rupprecht)
>   7. How to change the display manager from GDM to SLIM?
>      (Kennet R. Iversen)
>   8. Re: F10: Empathy has no support for IRC protocol? (Peter Gordon)
>   9. Re: Installation problem on Dell OptiPlex620 (Michael Magua)
>  10. Re: POS (Marcelo M. Garcia)
>  11. Re: CentOS 3rd party repositories? (Axel Thimm)
>  12. Re: Installation problem on Dell OptiPlex620 (Tony Molloy)
>  13. F10: a few issues and suggestions (Marcelo M. Garcia)
>  14. Re: F10: a few issues and suggestions (Robert P. J. Day)
>  15. Re: F10: a few issues and suggestions (Marcelo M. Garcia)
>  16. kde 4.1 for fedora 8 (hicham)
>  17. Re: 64 Bit Linux shows 4GB... was Using all of 4GB RAM...
>      (Alan Cox)
>  18. Re: [OT] CentOS 3rd party repositories? (Timothy Murphy)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:55:08 -0400
> From: Matthew Flaschen <matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu>
> Subject: Re: Java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin problem - (x86-64)
> To: "Community assistance, encouragement,       and advice for using
>        Fedora." <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <48E5A5AC.3020004 at gatech.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Trapper wrote:
> > I have been trying to resolve a java related issue with the java Firefox
> > plugin since the release of Fedora 10 Alpha x86_64. I am now using F10
> > Beta x86_64 and the difficulty still persists.
> >
> > I have:
> > java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.21.b12.fc10 (x86_64)
> > java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin (x86_64)
> > firefox 3.0.2 (x86_64)
> > kernel-2.6.27-0.352.rc7.git1.fc10 (x86_64)
> >
> > My problem:
> > The java plugin works but it does not work here:
> >
> > http://www.goes.noaa.gov/HURRLOOPS/huirloop.html
>
> You should file a bug, either at the Red Hat bug repository or at
> http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/
>
> Best,
>
> Matthew Flaschen
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:58:40 -0400
> From: Matthew Flaschen <matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu>
> Subject: Re: 64 Bit Linux shows 4GB... was Using all of 4GB RAM...
> To: "Community assistance, encouragement,       and advice for using
>        Fedora." <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <48E5A680.8070507 at gatech.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Tim wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 13:56 -0400, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> >> I appear to gain 935MB of RAM running the 64 bit version.  This is in
> >> spite of the spec sheet on my laptop saying:
> >>
> >> "Memory 4096 MB Memory Max Up to 4GB DDR2 (Up to 1 GB may not be
> >> available due to 32-bit operating system resource requirements)"
> >
> > That sort of disclaimer doesn't mean anything technically.  It's warning
> > the average user that having 4 gigs of RAM in their PC doesn't mean that
> > they'll have 4 gigs of *free* RAM, some of it will be used (when your OS
> > loads, it uses some of your RAM, and some OSs use lots of your RAM).
>
> Then why does it say 32-bit operating systems?  64-bit operating systems
> have baseline memory demands too.
>
> Matt Flaschen
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 07:14:35 +0100
> From: Tony Molloy <tony.molloy at ul.ie>
> Subject: Installation problem on Dell OptiPlex620
> To: "Community assistance, encouragement,       and advice for using
>        Fedora." <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <200810030714.36035.tony.molloy at ul.ie>
> Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="us-ascii"
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to install Fedora-9 on some Dell OptiPlex 620 boxes. I've tried
> both graphical and text based installs and get the same problem with both.
> When it tries to run anaconda it crashes with a long traceback. It's at the
> point where it is probeing for the video card the crash occurs.
>
> Does anybody have the magic incantation I can give to the boot sequence to
> get
> around this.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tony
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 01:16:07 -0500
> From: Renich Bon Ciric <renich at woralelandia.com>
> Subject: F10: Empathy has no support for IRC protocol?
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <1223014567.19234.1.camel at introdesk.penthouse.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hello,
>
> Is this a bug or is it a temporal no-IRC joke from the developers?
> --
> Renich Bon Ciric
> http://www.woralelandia.com/
>
> # Facebook
> http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=674792460
>
> # introbella (band)
> http://www.introbella.com/
>
> # Smolt uuid (pub_3e18efc2-dee4-459f-8d40-ddf489be817d)
>
> http://www.smolts.org/client/show/?uuid=pub_3e18efc2-dee4-459f-8d40-ddf489be817d
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 197 bytes
> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
> Url :
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20081003/da3d5646/attachment.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:47:44 +0200
> From: "Andrea Bencini" <andrea.bencini at tin.it>
> Subject: Re: disable ipv6
> To: <fedora-list at redhat.com>, <joachim.backes at rhrk.uni-kl.de>
> Message-ID: <00a001c9252c$5417bb80$0200640a at wtlc>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
>        reply-type=original
>
> > Andrea Bencini wrote:
> >> I installed FC9.
> >>
> >> I have "inet addr:" and "inet6 addr:" in the eth0 interface output of
> >> ifconfig command.
> >> How can I do to disable ipv6 in FC9?
> >> Andrea
> >
> > Hi Andrea,
> >
> > add this line to /etc/modprobe.conf:
> >
> > install ipv6 /bin/true
> >
> > and restart your network.
> >
> Until FC8 it was so, but in FC9 is different !!!
> I were looking for "/etc/modprobe.conf", but I didn't found it.
> Thanks
> Andrea
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:40:07 -0700
> From: "Wolfgang S. Rupprecht"
>        <wolfgang.rupprecht+gnus200810 at gmail.com<wolfgang.rupprecht%2Bgnus200810 at gmail.com>
> >
> Subject: f9 encrypted fs - how???
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <87skrep1ns.fsf at arbol.wsrcc.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> I see lots of references that F9 supports a encrypted filesystems
> natively and I recall that the installer even offered to set up
> encryption for me.  The question is, how does one set up encryption
> later on?  I can't find any recent documentation.  Google has millions
> of hits for all sorts of crazy schemes dating back to very early
> fedoras, but I have yet to find documentation for how to do it in F9,
> other than reinstalling things from scratch.  Anyone have any
> pointers?
>
> -wolfgang
> --
> Wolfgang S. Rupprecht              http://www.full-steam.org/  (ipv6-only)
>         You may need to config 6to4 to see the above pages.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 09:48:55 +0200
> From: "Kennet R. Iversen" <fedora at lykken.net>
> Subject: How to change the display manager from GDM to SLIM?
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <48E5CE67.2030502 at lykken.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> I have tried to get slim to start as my login manager instead of gdm,
> but everything I have tried so far has not worked.
>
> I have installed slim via yum and then tried the following approaches:
>
> First I tried to put the following line in /etc/X11/default-display-manager
>    /usr/bin/slim
>
> That did not work. Then I tried to put this line in /etc/inittab:
>    x:5:respawn:/usr/bin/slim >& /dev/null
>
> This did not work. I then tried to put this line in /etc/sysconfig/desktop
>    DISPLAYMANAGER="SLIM"
> and then added these to lines in /etc/X11/prefdm just after the
> GNOME/gdm part:
>    elif [ "$DISPLAYMANAGER" = SLIM ]; then
>        preferred=/usr/bin/slim
>
> This did not work either. I have not been able to find a solution that
> works. So, how do I change the default display manager from GDM to SLIM?
>
> Any suggestions are welcome
> Kennet
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "Peter Gordon" <peter at thecodergeek.com>
> Subject: Re: F10: Empathy has no support for IRC protocol?
> To: "Community assistance, encouragement,       and advice for using
>        Fedora." <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID:
>        <9c2493c678123a9073f7e795b7386a81.squirrel at webmail.thecodergeek.com
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Renich Bon Ciric wrote:
> > Is this a bug or is it a temporal no-IRC joke from the developers?
>
> You need to install telepathy-idle for this IRC support.
> --
> Peter Gordon (codergeek42) <peter at thecodergeek.com>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:11:36 +0200
> From: "Michael Magua" <mmglug at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Installation problem on Dell OptiPlex620
> To: "Community assistance, encouragement,       and advice for using
>        Fedora." <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID:
>        <f275c1080810030111i18c6bc93mf0364b60f540930f at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Probably due to the ATI graphics card, is it possible to specify vesa
> driver
> as a boot option i.e "linux vesa".
>
> Alternatively do a text install, at the prompt use
>
> linux text
>
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Tony Molloy <tony.molloy at ul.ie> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to install Fedora-9 on some Dell OptiPlex 620 boxes. I've
> tried
> > both graphical and text based installs and get the same problem with
> both.
> > When it tries to run anaconda it crashes with a long traceback. It's at
> the
> > point where it is probeing for the video card the crash occurs.
> >
> > Does anybody have the magic incantation I can give to the boot sequence
> to
> > get
> > around this.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Tony
> >
> > --
> > fedora-list mailing list
> > fedora-list at redhat.com
> > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> > Guidelines:
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Michael Magua
>
> RHCE 805008570430920
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20081003/74c9735b/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 09:16:29 +0100
> From: "Marcelo M. Garcia" <marcelo.maia.garcia at googlemail.com>
> Subject: Re: POS
> To: "Community assistance, encouragement,       and advice for using
>        Fedora." <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <48E5D4DD.1070606 at googlemail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Linuxguy123 wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 01:03 +0100, Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
> >> I just installed F10 and I already feel that it is a improvement over
> >> F9.
> >
> > What version of KDE does it use ?   (yum list kdebase or rpm -q kdebase)
> >
> > What improvements to KDE are you seeing ?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> Hi
>
> I use Gnome.I don't know why, but I don't like KDE.
>
> Regards
>
> M.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:54:39 +0300
> From: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net>
> Subject: Re: CentOS 3rd party repositories?
> To: vmarko at phy.bg.ac.yu, "Community assistance, encouragement,  and
>        advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <20081003095439.GA11308 at victor.nirvana>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 08:07:04PM +0000, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 October 2008 13:24, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > > <rant>
> > > > ATrpms has way too obsolete installation instructions (some others
> too
> > > > --- Dries comes to mind) to be seriously considered as a reliable
> > > > repository. For example, Livna has a .rpm file for each Fedora distro
> > > > that I just have to install and it is ready to go. On ATrpms website
> I
> > > > was told to manually edit the .repo files according to the template
> given
> > > > for Fedora 7 (!!!), changing some parameters to suit my own distro
> > > > (???)... Wtf? Did I miss the right instructions page? This is just
> > > > user-unfriendly, to say the least. But I may even try it out if
> someone
> > > > just gives me the exact contents of the appropriate .repo file that
> works
> > > > with CentOS 5.2, and if ATrpms has all these packages that I need,
> > > > updated more often than their website... </rant>
> > >
> > > <rantback>
> > > Try http://atrpms.net/name/atrpms-package-config/
> > > </rantback>
> >
> > <unrant>
> > Oh, well, that is a nice surprise! Apologies for the rant. :-)
> > </unrant>
> >
> > Btw, what is medley?
>
> An old attempt to provide a package that would enable many 3rd party
> repos. The attempt failed because the repos would not report new/old
> repo support and the medley was getting out of date.
> --
> Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 197 bytes
> Desc: not available
> Url :
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20081003/a6a84f66/attachment.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:56:41 +0100
> From: Tony Molloy <tony.molloy at ul.ie>
> Subject: Re: Installation problem on Dell OptiPlex620
> To: "Community assistance, encouragement,       and advice for using
>        Fedora." <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <200810031056.42722.tony.molloy at ul.ie>
> Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> On Friday 03 October 2008 09:11:36 Michael Magua wrote:
> > Probably due to the ATI graphics card, is it possible to specify vesa
> > driver as a boot option i.e "linux vesa".
> >
> > Alternatively do a text install, at the prompt use
> >
> > linux text
> >
>
> As I said I tried the text based install and got the same problem.
>
> When I boot from the boot.iso image how do I tell it to use the vesa
> driver.
> If I press <tab> to edit the boot line then adding vesa doesn't work.
>
> As a workaround I'm doing a live CD install on the boxes and I can then
> install what I want on them later.
>
> Tony
>
> > On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Tony Molloy <tony.molloy at ul.ie> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to install Fedora-9 on some Dell OptiPlex 620 boxes. I've
> > > tried both graphical and text based installs and get the same problem
> > > with both. When it tries to run anaconda it crashes with a long
> > > traceback. It's at the point where it is probeing for the video card
> the
> > > crash occurs.
> > >
> > > Does anybody have the magic incantation I can give to the boot sequence
> > > to get
> > > around this.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Tony
> > >
> > > --
> > > fedora-list mailing list
> > > fedora-list at redhat.com
> > > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> > > Guidelines:
> > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:00:32 +0100
> From: "Marcelo M. Garcia" <marcelo.maia.garcia at googlemail.com>
> Subject: F10: a few issues and suggestions
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <48E5ED40.1040803 at googlemail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Hi
>
> Yesterday I installed F10 and a few issues:
>
> 1) After checking the dvd, it ejected and when I inserted it back to
> continue the installation, there was a message saying that the there was
> no medium. I had to reboot and skip the checking to continue the
> installation.
>
> 2) At the end of installation, the dvd didn't ejected as expected.
>
> Suggestions:
>
> 3) I really liked the icons, but that default background (I think is the
> same in F9 and in the login screen) is horrible. I suggest to use "flow"
> as default background.
>
> 4) I liked the "silk"(?) background. If there could be a theme using it
> would be good. In certain way, something like the ubuntu theme, which I
> think if very elegant.
>
> 5) I also suggest to borrow as an extra theme the the gnome look of
> Opensuse 11. I don't know if I'll use, but at least is a interesting.
>
> Thanks for your attention.
>
> Marcelo
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 06:07:02 -0400
> From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday at crashcourse.ca>
> Subject: Re: F10: a few issues and suggestions
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <20081003060702.elmp6pgdzk8kg8s0 at crashcourse.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset=ISO-8859-1;     DelSp="Yes";
>        format="flowed"
>
> Quoting "Marcelo M. Garcia" <marcelo.maia.garcia at googlemail.com>:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Yesterday I installed F10 and a few issues:
> >
> > 1) After checking the dvd, it ejected and when I inserted it back to
> > continue the installation, there was a message saying that the there
> > was no medium. I had to reboot and skip the checking to continue the
> > installation.
>
>   i recall this being an issue with earlier versions of fedora.
> why is this still happening?
>
> rday
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:15:36 +0100
> From: "Marcelo M. Garcia" <marcelo.maia.garcia at googlemail.com>
> Subject: Re: F10: a few issues and suggestions
> To: "Community assistance, encouragement,       and advice for using
>        Fedora." <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <48E5F0C8.8080002 at googlemail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > Quoting "Marcelo M. Garcia" <marcelo.maia.garcia at googlemail.com>:
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Yesterday I installed F10 and a few issues:
> >>
> >> 1) After checking the dvd, it ejected and when I inserted it back to
> >> continue the installation, there was a message saying that the there
> >> was no medium. I had to reboot and skip the checking to continue the
> >> installation.
> >
> >   i recall this being an issue with earlier versions of fedora.
> > why is this still happening?
> >
> > rday
> >
> Hi
>
> I don't know if helps, but I have an old laptop, Dell Latitude D510.
>
> M.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:42:33 +0000
> From: hicham <hichamlinux at gmail.com>
> Subject: kde 4.1 for fedora 8
> To: "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID:
>        <309547d30810030342m30ca6dcfu82a88b786764a86 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hello
> I've installed kdebase4.1 in fedora 8 thru yumex, but I still get  kde
> 3.5.10 look
> how do i enable kde 4.1 on fedora 8 ?
> I haven't tried to install fedora 9 cause I've read that ati fglrx
> driver are not still working
>
> thanks
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 17
> Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 11:22:25 +0100
> From: Alan Cox <alan at lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> Subject: Re: 64 Bit Linux shows 4GB... was Using all of 4GB RAM...
> To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using
>        Fedora."        <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <20081003112225.1f37da14 at lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> > Then why does it say 32-bit operating systems?  64-bit operating systems
> > have baseline memory demands too.
>
> What is usually going on in those cases is that with 4GB RAM you need
> some space for PCI etc below the 4GB boundary, that means part of the RAM
> has to be mapped above the 4GB boundary which most 32bit OS can't reach
> (hugemem Linux kernels can but there is a big performance cost to such
> antics)
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 18
> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:17:13 +0100
> From: Timothy Murphy <gayleard at eircom.net>
> Subject: Re: [OT] CentOS 3rd party repositories?
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <gc4uvq$iu7$1 at ger.gmane.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
> > 1) kmod-nvidia and kmod-fglrx --- searching through the web, all I see
> > about CentOS is installing/compiling drivers straight from nVidia and
> ATI.
> > Are there maintained yumable packages that get autoupdated along with
> > CentOS kernel like the ones for Fedora?
>
> I didn't read the whole thread,
> but did anyone mention the epel.repo :
> "Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 5"?
> This is a sort of official redhat repository
> with extra packages for CentOS.
>
> --
> Timothy Murphy
> e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
> tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
> s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
> End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 56, Issue 25
> *******************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20081003/d42e3dea/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the fedora-list mailing list