[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: what is happening to reply-to header?



Reply-to header was my fault, I was trying to straighten out the https
issues. My apologies...

-Chris


On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 15:15 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 11:37 -0400, William Case wrote:
> > Hi;
> > 
> > On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 11:24 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > > On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 11:20:15 -0400
> > > Tom Horsley <tom horsley att net> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I noticed fedora-list messages were no longer being
> > > > automatically directed to my fedora mail folder by
> > > > my filter rules. Poking around, I see the Reply-To:
> > > > header now says the reply address is:
> > > > 
> > > >    fedora-list www redhat com
> > 
> > I am also getting some fedora list messages filtered (or not filtered as
> > the case maybe) into 'Unmatched' with the bulk of them still being
> > filtered into my 'Fedora' folder.  However, when I check the headings in
> > both the headings seem to be the same: i.e. fedora-list redhat com
> > 
> > Has something changed in Evolution (I don't have any recent upgrades) or
> > has some special identifier in 'fedora-list' been changed?
> Filtering has nothing to do with the Reply-To header. Al lewast it seems
> to me it shouldn't.
> --
> =======================================================================
> Most people have two reasons for doing anything -- a good reason, and
> the real reason.
> =======================================================================
> Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam sbcglobal net
> 


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]