certification of signatures

[Tim]

On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 18:29 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> The only way for the key to be treated as valid (which makes the
> warning go away) is for a trusted key (or keys) to sign it.  This
> means you could sign the key yourself (preferably with a local
> signature rather than an exportable signature)

I'm curious about why you'd need to do it with a local key.

-- 
[tim at localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.26.5-45.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.