On Thu October 30 2008 7:57:38 am Tim wrote:
> When I last looked at it, it was pretty much the same as Fedora. Just a
> slightly different font face, and size. And that's about all it often
> takes to make the difference between nice looking fonts and mediocre
> displays - a *slight* change in the font.
To Tim and to Rex who made a similar point: If you didn't take a look at his screen grab, you probably should. His problem is not about aesthetics, nice looking vs. mediocre, unicode coverage vs. beauty -- he's got a much bigger issue than that...
Brunswick, MD, USA