KDE 4.1: Unacceptable !

Mikkel L. Ellertson mikkel at infinity-ltd.com
Thu Sep 11 00:27:24 UTC 2008


Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> <pocallaghan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 12:24 -0600, linuxguy wrote:
>>> What is totally unacceptable is to ship an OS that totally lacks the
>>> very basic functionality that one uses everyday.
>> KDE is not an OS.
> 
> I really didn't think anyone needed to address that. I kinda hopes the
> OP was trying to make some point by using that wording, which I simply
> didn't get.
> 
> There are things that I don't like about KDE 4.1, speed is the biggest
> one, crap, it is not.
> 
From this and other posts, I don't think the OP "gets" the Fedora
philosophy. Maybe Fedora is the wrong distribution for him? There is
a reason there is more then one Linux distribution. It lets you
chose the best match for your needs and desires.

Mikkel
-- 

  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20080910/6022faaf/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the fedora-list mailing list