[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Why is Firefox such a beast??

On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 15:03 +0000, Beartooth wrote:
> 	I'm running Firefox under F8 and F9 on five different machines, 
> and it's a pain on every one of them, albeit in slightly different ways; 
> but the differences differ, too. 
> 	The first thing they have in common is that it takes forever to 
> launch -- when it does launch. The second is that it mostly doesn't. It 
> will try, and the little blue dots will circle for a while, and the 
> window list on the panel will show a mark for it -- for a while. 
> Sometimes one or another window will flash up and disappear, usually too 
> fast even to identify.
slow startup is because Firefox looks at all installed extensions to
determine whether an update is available and then Firefox looks to see
if a newer version of Firefox is available. The more extensions, the
longer the startup delay. You can configure this...

Firefox => Edit (menu) => Preferences => Advanced (tab) => Update (tab)
> 	Then it will either all go away, or I'll get a lasting window 
> telling me it's already running but not responding. Sometimes after that 
> Firefox will actually launch, sometimes not.
> 	If not, sometimes clicking the launcher again will bring it up; 
> sometimes it comes up double, or even with two different sessions -- and 
> shutting either will usually shut both. Other times it helps to do ps ax|
> grep firefox, find one or several pids with question marks, kill them, 
> and start over.
Firefox creates a 'lock' file -
in .mozilla/firefox/$YOUR_SALTED_PROFILE/.parentlock which is intended
to prevent multiple launches.

Multiple launches often occur when double clicking to start from a
launcher rather than a single click or 4 clicks when a double click is

I run into this far too often because I sysadmin a network with a lot of
less skilled computer users. This should probably be improved because
the cure seems to be as bad as the problem.
> 	It is consistently worse on some machines than others -- but not, 
> afaict, on F8 more than F9 or vice versa, nor with Ffx 2 more or less 
> than the other.
> 	I try to keep it as nearly standardized as I can. The best way is 
> to add FEBE to any new install of Firefox, and then copy in a FEBE folder 
> by scp or sneakermail, and run a restore. 
pardon my ignorance, what is FEBE ?
> 	But I have one machine (a Dell Poweredge SC 1420, formerly the 
> server for a private list, and not yet fully wiped) which refuses 
> adamantly to read media or to do scp; so there are hardly any extensions 
> on its Ffx -- and it works better.
> 	Are there extensions that Fedora will allow but not get along 
> with, or that don't get along with Fedora? Do I have too many? (The 
> latest FEBE restore tab listed 79 items.) Or what?
I find all of the language extensions to be pointless for my usage but I
can't tell if it's because my system/profile has existed for quite some
time and has been upgraded from like FC-4, FC-5, etc.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]