[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Git vs. Subversion. Which one?

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Paul W. Frields <stickster gmail com> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 06:33:20PM -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >So I wanted to know about the public opinions on which one is better, Git or
> >Subversion as versioning control system (VCS?).  If you can, please come up
> >with some reasons too!  Like what benefits do you think your preferred one has
> >that the other one doesn't offer!
> http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/GitSvnComparsion

I started with CVS and soon after moved to SVN, which was quite an
improvement.  However, I recently learned git and would *never* go
back.  For starters, it's *much* faster than any other system.  The
use of branches is completely phenomenal.  And the ability to quickly
set up and host a repository for anyone with just some file copies to
any HTTP share is worth its weight in gold.

Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
 gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
 http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
 irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug

fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list redhat com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Yes, actually recently I'm trying to learn git, and it makes a lot more sense to do the experimental stuff in a branched repository and then merge it in when it's done!!

Thanks for the responses guys, again, very appreciated!
I hope this thread would be of help to some other people too, although I would still like more responses from more people ;)
feng shaun gmail com
"Dare to Dream?"

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]