Chown ??? (getting way OT)

[Steve Lindemann]

g wrote:
> Steve Lindemann wrote:
> 
>> ...and I've been at this since the 70's and always thought it was 
>> "switch user".  Can't recall where I first picked that up
> 
> possible from novell unix?
> 
> 'switch user' / 'substitute user' = synonymous.
> 
> what would be interesting is how many know why unix/linux commands are terse. :)
> 

yup, substitute user is certainly equivalent, but much harder to spell 
so I still use switch user 8^)

...as to terse commands, how many have used a teletype console or a card 
punch machine as their primary input.  Anyone who's had to type on those 
beasts understands why terse is good.  ...oops, just gave it away.  At 
least the teletype was faster than inputing binary using switches.  Of 
course, there could be more to it that I missed... is there more?

We could always jump to (what I consider) more recent history and ask if 
anyone else knows why we use the h,j,k,l keys for cursor movements in vi.
--
Steve Lindemann                         __
Network Administrator                  //\\  ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Marmot Library Network, Inc.           \\//  against HTML/RTF email,
http://www.marmot.org                  //\\  vCards & M$ attachments
+1.970.242.3331 x116