[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: F10 Strange Audio Errors



on 12/26/2008 11:32 AM Sean Bruno wrote:
On Thu, 2008-12-25 at 18:52 -0800, Peter Langfelder wrote:
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Sean Bruno <sean bruno dsl-only net> wrote:
I'm seeing strange audio issues(skipping and buffering) when playing
audio from Amarok(1.4), Audacity and from the video game Quake Wars.

I have an on-board sound card:
00:04.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 AC'97
Audio Controller (rev a2)

And a USB Turntable:
Bus 002 Device 005: ID 08bb:2900 Texas Instruments Japan PCM2900 Audio
Codec

Periodically, while Amarok(1.4) is playing back I see:
Dec 25 16:48:45 localhost pulseaudio[15582]: module-alsa-sink.c: ALSA
woke us up to write new data to the device, but there was actually
nothing to write! Most likely t
his is an ALSA driver bug. Please report this issue to the PulseAudio
developers.

When Audacity is recording from the USB turntable I see:
ALSA sound/usb/usbaudio.c:351: frame 0 active: -70

And when Quake Wars is running, I see the following in the console
output:
snd_pcm_readi failed: Input/output error
snd_pcm_readi failed: Input/output error
snd_pcm_readi failed: Input/output error


Any ideas as to what is going on here?

Sean

I used to experience similar skipping and hesitating from Amarok
1.4... until I removed PulseAudio. Now amarok plays smoothly.

Peter

I assume that requires more than just stopping the pulse audio demon?


I did not want to test my luck so removed everything related to pulseaudio in addition, except

$ rpm -qa | grep pulse
pulseaudio-libs-glib2-0.9.13-6.fc10.i386
pulseaudio-core-libs-0.9.13-6.fc10.i386
pulseaudio-libs-0.9.13-6.fc10.i386
pulseaudio-libs-devel-0.9.13-6.fc10.i386
pulseaudio-utils-0.9.13-6.fc10.i386
pulseaudio-libs-zeroconf-0.9.13-6.fc10.i386


because those serve as dependencies for something else I have installed and want to keep.

it's a shame, since I had no luck with pulseaudio since F8 and really was hoping to keep it in F10 finally.

--
regards,
Oleksandr Korneta

I'm running F9 x86_64 and F10 i386 on x86_64 hardware, should this matter.

/The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from./



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]