[OT] linux viruses statics

[g]

Bruno Wolff III wrote:

> What are you trying to accomplish? It has been known almost from the start
> of virus scanning, that blacklists were a broken way to do things. So there
> really isn't a need to get a list of viruses or worms. If you want lists,
> you want lists of code that is OK to run.

in discussions on other lists and some local friends that run ms,
i would like to know numbers, not guesstimate's of what is what.

just to say to me some random number or percent is not acceptable,
and i do not wish to do same.

and as for failures of 'blacklist', i do agree. my isp had you post
held up in 'mail guard'. :) why, i do not know, but they do now
know that it was in error.

-- 
peace out.

tc,hago.

g
.

****
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today
**
to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it;
to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look at* it.
**
learn linux:
'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html
'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/
'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html
'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/
****

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20090130/4714f4e4/attachment-0001.sig>