cdrkit isoinfo and iso-info

[Bill Davidsen]

Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/25/2009 05:07 AM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> 
>> http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/linux-dist.html
>>
>> Who is right?  
>> Can both sides be right?
> 
> The cdrecord maintainer makes many such claims but fails to provide
> references. That is very suspect. He tried to do the same thing in
> Fedora Legal as well. His claims were discarded.
> 
Antonio seems to have clearly identified the GPL paragraphs which are not 
followed, IANAL but I don't think there's a option to "discard" complaints. I 
confess I never really looked at that part of the GPL before, but it seems to 
say what Antonio says it does.

> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-July/msg00000.html
> 
In any case RH has decided that they can ignore this rather than stop using the 
name and resolve it.

-- 
Bill Davidsen <davidsen at tmr.com>
   "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot